Xiaofei Wang vs Elijah Cham Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 Jun at 07:50 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
X. Wang vs E. Cham

CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Wang 1 - 0 Cham
They have played 3 sets in total, with Xiaofei Wang winning 2 and Elijah Cham winning 1. The last match between Xiaofei Wang and Elijah Cham was at the M15 Maanshan, 26-06-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Xiaofei Wang getting the victory 6-4 0-6 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Wang | 1 |
| Cham | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Maanshan(06-26-25)
X. Wang vs E. Cham H2H Profile
X. Wang vs E. Cham Match Preview:
- Recent form on second serves shows Cham winning 51.43% of points compared to Wang's 55.93%. Could this serve edge be significant? Yes, as there's a strong correlation with match outcomes.
- Examining return game performance, Cham has excelled by winning 56.1% of opponents' second serve points recently; Wang trails at 47.46%.
- On first serve returns, Cham's win rate is 33.87%, outperforming Wang's 28.87%, suggesting Cham may have an advantage here.
- When facing breakpoints, Cham saves them at a rate of 54.55%, significantly better than Wang's 30.77%—a crucial factor under pressure.
- Looking at overall match results in the past year, Cham has a winning rate of 66.67%, while Wang stands at 20%. Does this suggest an edge? Absolutely, Cham is clearly more successful.
- Cham's best performances are on Indoor Hard courts with a win rate of 75%, compared to Wang's best on Clay at 60%; their weakest surfaces further differentiate their strengths.
- Both players primarily compete at the Futures/ITF $10K level, but Cham's win rate at this level is much higher compared to Wang's.
- Cham has faced stronger opponents, with an average ranking of 282.17 against Wang's average opponent rank of 365.8, suggesting Cham is accustomed to tougher competition.
- In deciding sets, Cham wins 57% but Wang has managed a perfect 100%—could Wang's clutch performance under pressure be a decisive factor?
- Over recent events, take note of each player's form to assess current competitiveness—not just historical data.
- When it comes to converting breakpoints, Wang leads by converting 50% compared to Cham's 35.71%, an essential stat in critical situations.
Editorial Prediction (June 26, 2025, UTC):
Examining the players' recent performances, both strengths and weaknesses are evident. Cham showcases a comprehensive ability to both serve and return, with particularly strong breakpoint defense abilities that often tip matches in their favor.
Wang shines in their ability to convert breakpoints and possesses a flawless record in deciding sets, suggesting strong mental fortitude that could impact the match's outcome if pushed to the edge.
Overall, Cham's superior match win rate over the last year, along with the advantage on Indoor Hard surfaces, positions them as a slight favorite entering this match despite Wang's promising statistics in specific areas.
Based on the comparative analysis, Cham is likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming tennis match.
Xiaofei Wang vs Elijah Cham Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
X. Wang vs E. Cham H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 12 | Games Won | 14 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:19:55 | Average Match Time | 2:19:55 |
| 56% (52/93) | 1st Serve % | 62% (52/84) |
| 65% (34/52) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (35/52) |
| 44% (18/41) | 2nd Serve Win % | 59% (19/32) |
| 33% (3/9) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (4/8) |
| 36% (30/84) | Return Points Win % | 44% (41/93) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
X. Wang Recent Matches Played
E. Cham Recent Matches Played

X. Wang vs E. Cham Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.41% (82/66) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.00% (15/10) |
| 54.52% (175/146) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.00% (36/24) |
| 52.59% (1521/1371) | Games Win/Loss | 53.71% (326/281) |
| 55.12% (70/57) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.25% (9/7) |
| 60.00% (3/2) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 56.25% (9/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (6/3) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 396 | Aces Total | 20 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 285 | Total Double Faults | 36 |
| 1:8:46 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 426.01 | Average Opponent Rank | 264.12 |
| 62% (4069/6545) | 1st Serve % | 61% (537/887) |
| 68% (2767/4069) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (336/537) |
| 48% (1187/2476) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (169/350) |
| 45% (305/675) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (43/86) |
| 40% (2717/6738) | Return Points Win % | 44% (358/816) |
| 38.46% (5/8) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57.04% (77/58) | Futures W/L | 60.00% (15/10) |
| 56% (79/141) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (15/25) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 32% (8/25) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (4/6) |
| 57% (17/30) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (4/10) |
| 89% (84/75) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (15/13) |
| 11% (84/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (15/2) |
| 11% (64/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (10/2) |